WHY DID THE CABINET SUPPORT MAY'S DEAL?

The answer is obvious.  They wanted to protect their jobs.  This had nothing to do with what was in the best interests of the nation.  Hammond and company remained stoney-faced throughout the debates.  This cabal must go, and be replaced by true brexiteer leadership.  May only cares about legacy.  And Corbyn Rumpelstiltskin only cares about gaining power.   

THE BIGGEST EFFECT OF A NO DEAL

Something that all political parties have not considered is the latent, deep seated psychological effect on British workers of a NO DEAL. It would enable them to stand tall, believe in themselves, their own creative talent and enterprise. We once had this belief and it will come again.

MRS MAY'S LOVE-IN AT THE EU

Mrs May's love-in with the top EU leaders has been absolutely disgraceful.  She deserves to go.  We were all led to believe for over two years that we we going to leave the EU on March 29th.  But that has all changed, apparently.  Such is the leverage that the EU can exert upon us.  Mrs May has allowed the EU to twist her arm behind her back.   

HAMMOND AND MAY'S BRIBERY

"The chancellor has pledged to spend a £26.6bn Brexit war chest to boost the economy, if MPs vote to leave the European Union with a deal", according to the BBC. I have never, ever heard of such bribery and corruption. Both May and Hammond have childish beliefs that the British public, and in particular the Conservative Brexiteers, can be bought-off.  These two old pals should be sacked, as a matter of principle. That money should be available when we leave the EU with NO DEAL on March 29th.

MAY AND CORBYN COULD CAUSE RIOTS

If Britain does not leave the EU on March 29th with NO DEAL there could well be trouble that would make what is happening in France look like a children's tea party.  Corbyn's belligerent opposition to NO DEAL makes matters far worse.  No wonder the army is in a bunker preparing for the worst!!!  

HAMMOND SHOULD BE SACKED

Hammond was interviewed this morning on the BBC by Naga Munchetti.  She gave him an easy ride without challenging him.  She had no notes.  This was in sharp contrast to her colleague who did have notes, who subsequently interviewed a woman in a very challenging manner.  The woman was for prosecuting British soldiers over bloody Sunday.  Hammond was allowed by Naga to make what was in effect a rehearsed statement about why he had voted against the wishes of Mrs May last night.  May should sack him. Why was Naga so quiet?  Why did she have no notes prepared? Had she been told not to ask awkward questions?  Hammond is such a sly, smooth, slippery character who wriggles out of any situation and who moves in a world of the chief executives.  He is not fit to represent the ordinary man and woman, or the world of business, or the Government.  I hope, as many do, that NO DEAL is the final outcome on March 29th against the wishes of Hammond and all the other remainers who now pretend not to be. 

NO DEAL - CERTAINTY

NO DEAL - WE ARE OUT OF THE EU

NO DEAL - WE WILL HOLD ALL FUTURE TRADE BARGAINING CHIPS

NO DEAL - WE HAVE FULL CONTROL OF OUR BORDERS (OUR IMMIGRATION LEVELS AND LAWS ARE A LAUGHING STOCK IN THE REST OF THE WORLD)

NO DEAL - WE CAN EDUCATE THE BRITISH AND NOT MILLIONS OF FOREIGN STUDENTS

NO DEAL - SIMPLY GIVES US EVERYTHING THAT VOTERS ASKED FOR IN THE REFERENDUM

NO DEAL - GIVES US THE CERTAINTY BRITISH INDUSTRY WANTS, NOW, NOT SOME TIME IN THE FUTURE!!!