THE LEAVE CAMPAIGNERS ARE PUSSY-FOOTING AROUND

Those leading the LEAVE campaign are pussy-footing around, choosing their words carefully because they don't want to upset their Conservative colleagues who want to stay IN the EU.  This is a fight to the death - much more important than allegiance to a political party. 

IMPEACHMENT OF CAMERON

Con-man and hypocrite that he is, Cameron has been criticising the corruption in other countries.   Cameron's crime is not corruption, but something just as sinister. It is his dishonesty over a number of years in misleading the people on immigration figures.  We are waking up to reality.  Cameron is never going to get his figures down.  He must have known his policy of promoting continued membership of the EU with its freedom of travel for all EU members, that he would see the numbers of migrants increase way beyond his own targets he had set. He has deliberately lied and misled the British people.  Cameron must be impeached.

CAMERON'S FIVE GUARANTEES ARE USELESS. CAMERON IS TOTALLY DISCREDITED.  HE JUST CANNOT KEEP HIS PROMISES. HE CAN GIVE NO GUARANTEE OF A LIMIT ON THE NUMBER OF IMMIGRANTS ENTERING THE COUNTRY. THAT NUMBER IS TOTALLY OUT OF CONTROL.  

BLIAR SAID TODAY 'OUTERS' WOULD HAVE FREEDOM OF TRAVEL RESTRICTED

What another  ridiculous statement by Blair!

He also seems to think (like the idiot that he is) that freedom of movement is a good thing.  Well it is.  But not completely unrestricted as he and the EU advocate.  I don't think any other country in the EU has the same problem as we do. The whole point is that if we come out of the EU we could then have the power to restrict immigration to a level we could cope with, letting in those who we want to have here.  Immigrants are coming to Europe by land, sea and air from all over the world.  We need to get back to reality and set sensible targets, Mr Cameron.

What would this Government do to any establishment that had failed abysmally to achieve the target it had been set? Sack the Chief Executive? Impeach the Chief Executive and supporters? Sue the Chief Executive for lying and deceiving? Look for a different way of operating? Appoint a new Chief Executive?

Remember Mr Cameron, for every finger you point at the Brexiteers, there are four pointing back. Impeachment would be appropriate for you Cameron, and Osborne. A back bench motion of no confidence would be too kind.

WHY IS THE EU SO CORRUPTING?

It seems (according to the so-called experts at the BBC who like to "explain" EU finances to us mere mortals) that we give approximately 200 million pounds to the EU every week. The BBC "carefully explained" that this is nett expenditure of the 350 million or so that we  are supposed to hand over each week.  In its generosity, the EU dispenses back to us approximately 150 million.  The BBC treats people like idiots. 

The 150 million (approximate) is a bribe to keep us all sweet.  The EU is giving back our money. Thank you very much EU.  This money is given to various organisations, some big, some small.  So how about naming some of the big ones.  We could start with the Institute of Fiscal Studies high-lighted by Cameron today as being the "gold standard".  Then there is the other "gold standard", the BBC itself dancing to the Government's tune.  And there is a host other Government backed beneficiaries including the bank of England, headed by a Canadian of all people.   This is corruption on a grand scale, undermining  national institutions.  This is how the EU manipulates people.  No wonder they all worship at the altar of the EU, all at Cameron's command, calling down fire and brimstone!  They betray our country and other countries in the EU.  They are all in hock to the EU. 

The Institute for Fiscal Studies threatens us with two more years of austerity.  Really!  Is that all?  I would willingly take that in exchange for freedom from the EU for a lifetime.  In any case the approximate figures are small beer compared to the national expenditure.  Cameron emphasises the economic benefits of being in the EU.  He makes no case for being out. It would be better to have a more balanced view from the Government.  But the economic battle is the wrong battle to be fighting, judging from the numbers of migrants still coming on flimsy boats.  Mr Cameron, we just cannot go on like this.

CAMERON & OSBORNE BEHAVING LIKE RULERS OF A FAILED STATE

Today, they heaped lie upon lie about our economic prospects in order to save their skins - their jobs are on the line.  Al-Qaeda would welcome them.  They willingly give away their Country.  Traitors would be an appropriate description. They are a disgrace. I find it hard to accept that such people are supposed to be our leaders. Whatever the outcome of the referendum, this is the end of Cameron and Osborne.    

LABOUR AND THE SCOTS SHOULD SAY NO TO THE EU

This is a no-brainer - just think what would happen to Cameron and Osborne - the arch enemies of Britain. 

WHAT DO BRITISH CREATORS THINK ABOUT BREXIT?

The government turns to economists for the remain case. Did the Bank of England predict the recent banking crisis? Did The International Monetary Fund predict the crisis? This much we can be very certain about - the failure of a large number of top economists in these organisations to predict the crisis. Did anyone predict the crisis? No-one did. So why should anyone trust economists to get anything right? Economists opinions are questionable. Yet economists seem to rule. Why? Economists create or make nothing.

The government doesn't consult creators (engineers, scientists, architects, musicians, artists and the like - those who create and make the world what it is) to ask their opinion on whether or not Britain should remain in the EU. Yet we do have a referendum (thanks largely to UKIP and Nigel Farage) when for one short time everyone can be involved in the decision.

When it comes to creativity and originality, the whole world is our market place, not just the EU. Britain has traditionally been at the forefront of innovation and inventiveness, but in recent years (ever since the World War II) it has not truly capitalised on it, but it has been squandered by successive governments and those dreadful economists. 

We invented the computer, coding, radar, the jet engine and afterwards we built the first jet airliner. We even invented the Internet. I would like to see some of that spirit back in Britain. It is not just about jobs. It is a matter of pride, in the ownership, the design and testing processes - designed, manufactured and tested in Britain.  These are lessons learned by our German and Japanese friends.  

DID YOU KNOW MR CAMERON IS YELLOW NOT BLUE?

That's right Yellow through and through.  He's afraid Nigel Farage might bite him on the bum. Cameron refuses to debate live with Nigel Farage. Cameron is the proverbial bully boy who is really a coward.

WHY IS THE BBC BIASED AGAINST BREXIT?

The BBC leads with the views of Cameron and the Remainians. The Remainians are given the privilege of initiating a conversation, drawing on the opinions of 'experts' who have been lined-up. The Remainians and the 'experts are interviewed at length by the BBC, giving more time to a pro Cameron view..

The Brexiteers are usually made to take second place. When the Brexiteers do take the initiative, the BBC brings on its own attack wolf. And we are treated to an extensive talk on the BBC's, supposed independent, but undoubtedly biased and pro Cameron view. I am tired of so-called BBC 'experts' acting like failed politicians.

WE KNOW WHERE YOU STAND BBC. YOUR MOTIVES ARE QUESTIONABLE.

HOW MUCH IS THE BBC DEPENDENT ON THE EU?

WHY DOES THE BBC IGNORE NIGEL FARAGE?

Nigel has been working towards a BREXIT for over 20 years. Yet the BBC persists in ignoring what he has to say. The BBC and its interviewers are most definitely biased.